JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 27, 2016

A- de 2016

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva

✓Claimant Federacion Nacional De Cafeteros De Colombia

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Nulidad Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Rechazar por no cumplir con el requisito de argumentación suficiente
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Incidente de nulidad de la sentencia T-410/14 formulado por el apoderado de la Federación Nacional de Cafeteros de Colombia.

El memorialista formuló un único reproche que denominó improcedencia de la acción de tutela.

Adujo, que este recurso constitucional no procede cuanto existen otros medios de defensa judicial.

La Sala Plena de la Corporación decide RECHAZAR el recurso formulado, en tanto no se presentó un cargo que permitiera estudiar si la sentencia mencionada incurrió en causal de nulidad.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. RECHAZAR la solicitud de nulidad de la Sentencia T-410 de 2014, formulada por la Federacion Nacional de Cafeteros de Colombia.
  2. SEGUNDO. COMUNIQUESE la presente providencia al peticionario, con la advertencia de que contra esta decision no procede ningun recurso.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.